 | Posts: 2051 | | Joined: 2011-01-15 | | Offline |
|
Alexsoulsay wrote:
ady_aly wrote:
Okay, it means that we need to decrease the work ethics range from 1-20 to 1-(20 - 20 * percentage of faster training) and it will still be the same, but everything will happen earlier. |
Probably yes, but as I said before, it's probably more acceptable for me not to interfere with the game. No one knows how the changes will play out in xx seasons. But keep the current model, but only ensure a natural retirement later (for all players - approx. 33-35 years - randomly). Players start to decline physically like now and from the age of 36 (further decline of physical or other skills). At 40 years end in the game. Easy not complicated.  |
Yes, I would mostly agree. There are two things to consider. Firstly, we need to solve the problem with early retirement of players. In my opinion, there should not be a specified point in time when a player ends his career. I think rather about a range of time, just like it is done right now, but I would postpone it, for example players would retire at the age of 38-42. This range of time is a some kind of combination of excitement and mystery. The one designated age would be boring  . The second thing is to deal with the short peak of development. We probably should not mess with development per se. Faster gaining of abilities means that work ethic is less important. I would not touch it at all, current consensus enables to build team based on proper training and at the same time force you to replace players once per several seasons. What I suggest is to lengthen the process of the drop of skills. Decline of skills should last probably significantly longer than just 3 seasons. So players can lose their skills starting from 33 years old, but it should take several seasons to reach the point of 13 in every physical skill. This will cause that players will have lowered their skills to the level of 13 at the age of 36-37, not at the age of 35.
Maybe other, more complicated proposals are much clearer and gives a lot of opportunities to develop this game, but currently I will focus on the basics. So this is why I suggest postponing a little bit the age of retirement and lengthening the drop of physical skills. Those are quite small changes, but significant from my point of view. Those two problems are critical right now because cause that we see old players in NT and even in leading teams, what makes the game unreal.  |
|
|
 | Posts: 57 | | Joined: 2014-05-26 | | Offline |
|
Alexsoulsay wrote:
ady_aly wrote:
Okay, it means that we need to decrease the work ethics range from 1-20 to 1-(20 - 20 * percentage of faster training) and it will still be the same, but everything will happen earlier. |
Probably yes, but as I said before, it's probably more acceptable for me not to interfere with the game. No one knows how the changes will play out in xx seasons. But keep the current model, but only ensure a natural retirement later (for all players - approx. 33-35 years - randomly). Players start to decline physically like now and from the age of 36 (further decline of physical or other skills). At 40 years end in the game. Easy not complicated. |
Finnaly ! |
|
|
|
